REVIEW ARTICLE


GDP Growth and Health Care Expenditures Worldwide



Milos Stepovic1, *
1 Faculty of Medical Science, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 234
Abstract HTML Views: 105
PDF Downloads: 80
ePub Downloads: 72
Total Views/Downloads: 491
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 153
Abstract HTML Views: 76
PDF Downloads: 59
ePub Downloads: 50
Total Views/Downloads: 338



© 2019 Milos Stepovic

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Svetozara Markovica 69, 34 000 Kragujevac, Serbia; Tel: +381 34 306 800; E-mail: stepovicmilos@yahoo.com


Abstract

Background:

Impact of large recessions on GDP growth is well documented and their effect on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth is definitive. Health care expenditure is growing everywhere in the world. The most important factors such as GDP, income per capita, health system factors, urbanization, aging, and socio-demographic factors are well determined and described.

Objective:

The main aim of this literature review is the summation of all factors affecting the GDP and healthcare expenditure. The second aim is presenting the bigger picture of the multifactorial connection between all impacts on healthcare expenditure. The last aim is proposing possible strategies for the development of sustainable health systems.

Conclusion:

Tracking the economic trend changes is necessary. Government investments in health must be as large as countries can afford due to the population aging, non-communicable disease and treatment, and pharmacological innovations. The cost-effectiveness estimates and Hierarchical task analyses are among some plausible solutions for making informed resource allocation decisions.

Keywords: Global health, Health expenditure, Medical spending, Financing, Health economy, World.



1. INTRODUCTION

Healthcare expenditure is growing in all countries. Healthcare expenditure is becoming a significant challenge for the financial sustainability of national health systems even in high-income countries. Both developing and developed countries are working to define the factors involved in this healthcare expenditure management. Indicators affecting economic growth can be tracked ever since the largest recessions. Understanding economic growth concept is essential in order to point out cross-country variation in adaptable policies and mistakes, especially in the time of crisis. Literature data determined some factors related to healthcare expenditure: income per capita as the core one, health system factors, GDP, socio-demographic characteristic (gender and age), and level of urbanization. The problem of healthcare expenditure is multifactorial. Healthcare expenditure management differs not only in different areas in the world but also in different parts of the same country. For instance, per capita spending, as well as GDP allocation percent is different in developing and developed countries, which is managed by financial and political decisions.

The first aim of the study is to review the existing literature focusing on GDP and health expenditure growth. The second aim is to assess the existence of the relationship between them. Firstly, the paper is making an overview of the historical effects of the biggest recessions in the world on GDP and recovery of countries. Secondly, it reviewed papers dealing with the subject of the health care expenditure of OECD, BRICS, CEMAC, CIVETS, MENA, and countries which are not part of these clusters. In the end, this paper summarized all the available knowledge of crucial factors influencing health care expenditure in relation to GDP growth. This literature review provides a narrow focus on existing knowledge gaps that will initiate some future research. Also, it gives a hint on plausible government strategies that may be crucial for the development of sustainable health systems.

1.1. Historical Effect of Large Recessions on GDP

An economic recession is defined as a decline in GDP for two or more consecutive quarters. If the recession affects multiple countries and lasts for a long time, then it is defined as a deep recession [1, 2]. A lot of macroeconomic indicators are used to compare recessions like – GDP decrease, personal income, trade volume decrease, increase in the unemployment rate, duration, etc. [3, 4].

The most severe recession (1929-1939) was the Great Depression. It started in the US but affected every country in the world with different severity. It lasted for one decade. Recession in Latin America and Germany started in 1928. Although it started a little earlier than the US recession, it made an almost equal loss [5, 6]. There were a lot of factors acknowledged as a cause for recession but the main problem was government policies. This depression resulted in increased unemployment rates and big declines in output [7, 8]. Between 1929 and 1933, industrial production in the US decreased by almost its half, the GDP by one third, and the unemployment rate increased by twenty percent. GDP growth in this period was slower than before the First World War [9, 10]. A lot of countries experienced negative economic growth. Considering economic growth, the leading countries were Canada, the US, Austria, Netherlands, New Zealand, Germany, and France. Countries afflicted by banking and financial crises were Austria, Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Switzerland, United States, and Yugoslavia [11]. Trade declined in 27 leading countries during this period [12]. The UK had a low growth rate during most of the 1920s because of their decision from 1925 to return to the gold standard. The depression in the UK and France officially started in 1930. However, the decline in industrial production in the UK was not as severe as in the US though it was still considerable [13, 14]. Some less developed countries also experienced severe depressions. Argentina, Brazil, and Japan had been afflicted with an intermediate depression level [15, 16]. The US recovery began in 1930 with a GDP rise of about 9% and finished in 1942 when the US was on track with the previous trend position. The economic recovery of the UK, Latin America, Germany, and Japan started at a similar period, during 1932 [17]. Canada and Europeans countries started to recover after 1933. France was an exception because of her later depression experience. France started to recover in 1938. [18]. The biggest economic impact of the Great Depression was an alarming rate of unemployment [19]. GDP is eventually restored over time but slumps after a recession last for a long time [20].

A very important recession occurred during the 1970s. Its importance and the main difference in relation to other recessions was the coexistence of high infiltration and slow economic growth and the high level of unemployment rates. This crisis affected Europe and North America mostly due to their competitiveness in the rising metal industry. The crisis becomes obvious after the stock market crash in the UK followed by a decrease in GDP and electricity deliver [21].

The decrease in GDP during this period was not the main concern. The main concern was high and constantly rising unemployment rates. The low unemployment rate from before the crisis has never been restored after the recession [22]. The oil crisis which started in the Middle East when the price of oil increased was considered to be the cause [23].

The economic collapse of post-Soviet Republics in 1990 was followed by two of the biggest recessions: recession in Russia and recession in Ukraine. During the recession in Russia (1991-1996), GDP declined to nearly its half, mostly in military-industrial production [24]. Ukraine experienced an even worse economic breakdown (1991-1999) with GDP in 1999 being only 40% of GDP in 1991. Recessions in both countries were classified as ultra-recessions [25 - 27]. Concerning the Asian financial crisis (1997-1999), recession in Thailand was disastrous. Japan experienced two smaller recessions. Recession in South Korea was classified as major [28]. An Argentinean recession (2001-2002) was considered to be severe, with the decline of GDP growth rates to 4.04%, especially in time of the largest economic decrease when GDP decreased by 10.9% in one year [29].

Among the Scandinavian countries, Finland experienced the biggest recession after 1995 and again in 2008 and 2009. The low growth period in Denmark (1980) was not as bad as recessions in Sweden and Finland (1990) [30]. Recovery courses after these recessions were different. Sweden recovered the fastest. In 2010, the annual growth of GDP in Sweden was near 6%. The other two countries recovered but much slower. Difference between crises in 1980 and 1990 and the crisis in 2008 and 2009 was the lower unemployment rate in the latter. This difference could be explained by the adjustment of Nordic countries to the crisis- They used temporary changes, not permanent ones [31].

The global financial crisis, which started in the USA in 2007, can be considered as a major recession in the EU and Japan and a severe recession in the USA [32]. 25 of 27 EU countries experienced a recession (except Poland and Slovakia). The strongest recession was in Latvia and Estonia and the weakest in Cyprus, Malta, and France. In 2010, all major economies restored to the initial growth rate except the European. European economy got into a new recession in 2012. By data on GDP, it affected mostly small or medium-size countries [33, 34].

BRICS, the association of five major emerging national economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, conducted viable health reforms in recent years. Health reforms of BRICS were diverse but they shared a common aim – the strengthening of the government’s role in health and financing health care. Reliance on public financing is necessary for universal health coverage. However, private financing, in the form of voluntary health insurance and OOP (Out-of-Pocket), represents a large part of health spending. BRICS spend less total government spending on health than many OECD countries. There were different motives for reaching the UHC (Unified Health Care) health insurance system in BRICS. Due to the fact that rail had been under military influence for a long time, there were tendencies for health reforms to be driven rather by civil society than government. So, in 1988, a Unified Health System was established. There was universal health coverage in the Soviet health system but such coverage collapsed with the break-up of the Soviet Union. The early post-Soviet health reforms of 1990 introduced mandatory health insurance. Universal health coverage is now guaranteed in the Russian Federation. In India, several factors led to the health reforms. The existing public sector system by which it was expected to deliver low-cost health care to all Indians failed and out-of-pocket payments placed a large burden on the poor. In 2005, the reforms of health care in the public sector took place. National Rural Health Mission and National Urban Health Mission were intoduced. In China, health insurance coverage was far from universal. By 2002, only about half of the urban population and 90% of the rural population had insurance coverage. Reforms that were made in 2009 gave the Chinese government a major role in the health sector, adjusting public funds to increase insurance coverage and strengthen primary care services. In South Africa, where non-communicable and communicable disease and injuries affected lower socio-economic levels, low percent of the population had private insurance and the majority relied on tax-funded services. Due to that fact, the South African government introduced a tax-funded National Health Insurance Fund as the solution for future UHC.

Due to the fact that universal or near-universal health insurance coverage exists in most OECD countries, coverage extension has been the focus of recent reforms in only a few countries. Australia, for example, shifted from a voluntary to mandatory universal insurance with the introduction of Medicare in 1984. Switzerland mandated the compulsory purchase of a private health insurance policy in 1994, with that moving from near-universal to universal coverage. Since establishing its social health insurance program, Spain has implemented a series of coverage expansions. By 2000, coverage reached 99.8% of the population. France filled the final gaps in social insurance coverage in 2000, by its Couverture médicale universelle. In the Netherlands, insurance has been made compulsory for 65% of the population, including all vulnerable groups.

Lack of coverage for certain services such as dental care, prescription drugs, mental or behavioral health care, rehabilitative or post-acute care, and infertility treatments vary widely across OECD countries. Korea, Mexico, and Turkey have systems in which more than a third of the cost is borne directly by patients. The practice of patients making out-of-pocket payments to supplement provider fees is common in a small number of OECD countries (mainly among the new Eastern European members).

Lack of health insurance coverage in America is a significant threat to the overall wellbeing of their citizens. Health care in America is one of the most expensive in the world. Also, it is one of the few without universal health coverage. Reforms suggested by the country’s leaders in 1912, 1932, 1948, and 1971 were taken down by the American Medical Association. In fact, for many years, the AMA was a leading opponent of universal health care until the American Counseling Association in 2010. The most significant change was brought by LB. Jonson in 1965. Although it had not presented universal health care, it covered people who were less likely to have health insurance, such as older adults, the disabled, and poor children. Today, nearly 90% of Americans have health insurance. The ACA has had its successes, but also its challenges. With the rising costs of health care and poor population health outcomes compared to other high-income countries, more reforms will be needed soon.

Recessions are of great importance because they describe the periods when countries had to adapt and change their health system priorities. The recession affected the micro and macro-economics of every country so the Government had to adapt their investments in public health sectors. Adaptation had not always been made properly. Mistakes that the Governments made affected the tempo of economic recovery. Understanding the historical background of economic recessions is essential in order to prevent it from repeating. Also, it is crucial to make an unbiased revision of governmental impact on great economic recessions of the past. That will give health economy researchers an insight which will instruct them to form and propose more efficient strategies in health expenditure management.

2. METHODS AND EARCH STRATEGY

This paper represents a descriptive literature review of articles dealing with the subject of GDP and HCE growth. Analyzed articles are not country-specific; they included all representable conclusions from developing and developed countries with reference to OECD, BRICS, CEMAC, CIVETS, and MENA countries. An electronic search of the published literature was conducted in NCBI Databases — MEDLINE /PubMed, NLM Catalogue, and PubMed Central using a combination of keywords by which we got the articles we considered in our paper (Fig. 1). Also, Google Scholar and World of Science were used for additional search.

Inclusion criteria were full-available articles in English, original articles, data report, and review articles not older than 20 years. Exclusion criteria were articles not fully available, unpublished studies, studies older than 20 years, and studies with no interest in the subject of GDP and HCE.

Electronic searches were conducted with the last year of 2018. The applied combination of keywords was carefully chosen to cover the most commonly used terms in the titles of publications dealing with global domestic products and health care expenditure. We tried to ensure inclusion of the largest possible number of the publications dealing with health economics, and exclusion of the largest possible number of irrelevant publications. No filter was applied in the MEDLINE database. The final applied combination included keywords combined with the Boolean search operators “OR” and “AND.”

The next combinations of keywords were used with the purpose of getting the information of importance for the subject of the paper’s interest: health care expenditure and developing countries, health care expenditure and developed countries, GDP and developing countries, GDP and developed countries, GDP and health expenditure, health care expenditure and health care system factor/income/socio-demographic factors/urbanization.

After a detailed search, only articles dealing with the problem of healthcare expenditure and GDP growth were taken into consideration. Summation of all results can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. Summation of all reviewed articles by year, author, type of study, country and relationship that was found in articles
Year Authors Type of Study Country Relationship*
2016 Jakovljevic Commentary article Japan Yes – Elderly and HCE
2016 Jakovljevic and Getzen Data Report Low and middle income country, BRICS, N-11 Yes – GDP and THC
2014 Rao et al. Original article, Cross-sectional BRICS Yes – GDP and health care
2001 Hashmati Original article, Cross-sectional OECD Yes – GDP and HCE
2002 Gerdtham and Lothgren Original article, Cross-sectional OECD Yes – GDP and HCE
2013 Lago-Peñas Original article OECD Yes – Per capita income, GDP and HCE
2012 Elmi and Sadeghi Original article Developing countries Yes – Income and GDP
2017 Cetin and Ecevit Original article, OECD Yes – GDP and HCE
2015 Ollivaud and Turner Review article OECD Yes – Global crisis and GDP
2017 Kouki et al. Review and original article Emerging and developed countries Yes – Financial crisis and GDP
2014 Majdi and Younes Data report Developed,
emerging, and countries in development
No – Crisis and GDP
2017 Zaman et al. Data report Bangladesh Yes – GDP, income and HCE
2012 Eryiğit et al. Original article Turkey Yes – Education, HCE and economic growth
2017 Piabuo and Tieguhong Review article CEMAC Yes – HCE and economic growth
2011 Mehrara and Musai Original article Oil exporting countries No – GPD and HCE
2017 Ali et al Original article, Panel study Pakistan, China, India, and Bangladesh No - Health expenditure and GDP
2016 Wouters and McKee Review OECD Yes – HC and private funding
2013 Yi et al. Original article, comparative analysis CIVETS Yes – Economics growth
2016 Akadre Original article CIVETS Yes – Economics growth
2006 Le et al. Original article Vietnam Yes – Private sector development and economic growth
2015 Tomé, and Goyal Original article India Yes – Human resource development, education, and economic growth
2013 Sghari and Hammami Original article Developed
Countries
Yes – Bilateral causality GDR and HCA
2016 Bedir Original article Developing countries Yes – Income, GDP and HCE
2007 Collier and Goderis Original paper Developed and developing countries Yes – Income and HCE
2012 Mehrara et al. Original article, Panel study MENA Yes – HCE and GDP
2007 Costa Font and Pons Novell Original article Spanish region Yes – Insurance and HCE
2009 Mehrdad Commentary article Iran Yes – Health system and HCE
2016 Rezaei et al. Original article Iran Yes – GDP per capita, degree of urbanization, illiteracy rate and HCE
2012 Magazzino and Mele Original article, Panel study Italy Yes – GDP, unemployment rate, the number of beds in community hospitals, urbanization, % of the population and HCE
2011 Bilgel and Tran Original article, Panel study Canada Yes – GDP, urbanization and HCE
2014 Jakovljevic Commentary article Serbia Yes – GDP growth
2014 Jakovljevic Original article BRICS Yes – Insurance and HCE
2011 Jakovljevic et al. Original article Serbia Yes – HCE growth
2013 Jakovljevic Review article Southeastern Europe Yes – HCE studies and HCE growth
2016 Jakovljevic et al. Original article Eastern Europe Yes – GDP and HCE growth
1989 Kim and Chun Original article Korea Yes – Increase in hospital bed, degree of urbanization and HCE
2002 Lee and Jung Original article Korea Yes – Population size, elder population, number of physicians and HCE
2004 Tchoe et al. Original article, Panel study Korea Yes – GDP, elderly and HCE
2012 Squires Original article United States Yes – Higher prices, more accessible technology, and HCE
2013 Kimyoung et al. Original article Korea Yes – Elderly population, GDP and HCE
2006 Leal et al. Original article European Union Yes – Noncommittal diseases and HCE
2014 Fanourgiakis and Kanoupakis Original article European Union Yes – Noncommittal diseases and HCE
2015 Petrou Original article Cyprus Yes – Number of emergency room visits, number of unnecessary laboratory tests and HCE
2014 Petrou Original article Cyprus Yes – Pharmaceutical expenditureand HCE
2017 Abdullah et al. Original article Asia Yes – Income and HCE
2014 Lv et al. Original article African Yes – GDP, income and HCE
2008 Clemente et al. Original article OECD Yes – Non-pharmaceutical expenditure and HCE
2019 Dinçerand Yuksel Review article E7 countries YES – Economic growth and HCE
*Answers YES/NO implies that there was/was not found relationship between examined variables
Fig. (1). Number of found articles in named databases.

3. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON HEALTH EXPENDITURE AND ECONOMY GROWTH

Total health expenditure is defined as the sum of public and private health spending and it covers both the preventive and curative services along with emergency and rehabilitative health services for the entire population. Ministry of Finance of a country allocates the budget for health expenditure in a fiscal year. That allocated budget has been reported by different studies to differ for developed and developing countries [35]. The relationship between public health expenditure and economic growth has been investigated in developing and developed countries, but researchers have not come to a general conclusion. This may imply that healthcare expenditure will mostly be managed by private insurance and out-of-pocket payment. With that, growth of the total health expenditure has become an immense concern in most of the developing countries as along with out-of-pocket spending, especially in third world countries [36].

One of the biggest and latest global financial crises was widely known as the Subprime mortgage. In European countries, as well as the United States, the financial crisis caused by the mortgage crisis was serious. European Central bank decided to lower the rate of interest taken in 2008 as the first act against newly formed crises. Japan was also a victim of great depression 2008-09. Japanese manufacturing industries such as the auto industry had fallen into a slump. In 2007, international sale of automobiles had exceeded domestic sales but in 2008-09, some of the contract workers were cut off. Japan was not directly involved in the subprime mortgage crisis, but its economy depended on external demand and, therefore, it was negatively affected. A lot of US investors withdrew a huge amount of money from the BRICs stock market, which caused the shrinkage of the stock market index in each of the BRICs. It was particularly obvious in Russia and Brazil. But BRICs are now facing a different stage, and the economy of each of its countries is close to the mature mode. The number of people in upper-income brackets increased recently and their domestic demand is going to spread. Despite a global financial impact, India can achieve a 7-8% growth rate in the forthcoming years. Its economy will be more under the control of domestic than international factors. In 2008, China announced to take measures to counter depression supervised by their government. They ought to help in trade and regaining the Chinese market credibility. In the end, BRICs total GDP based on PPP share of world total exceeded the US’s in 2007. BRICS countries relevance refers to the fact that they are the core of the EM7 group and contribute mostly to one half of the real economic growth worldwide. Furthermore, their potential for improvement in universal health coverage by extending health care investment remains substantially larger in comparison to most high-income OECD economies. This is due to large surplus and economic growth and significant existing inequities. A large share of the general population is still living beneath or close to the poverty line. In the study about evolving healthcare expenditures of BRICS countries, Jakovljevic et al. found that these countries were able to increase their investments in health care but with the increase in the out-of-pocket share of health spending. Russia’s per capita spending was the highest in 2013 and by the statistics, this will not change in the future. In the future, China will increase its percentage of GDP spent on health care [37]. India and South Africa have the advantage of younger populations and Russia and China have a problem of increasing trend in population aging [38]. Existing health care sectors in the BRICS economies may not be enough to meet rising population demand for medical services. Due to the fact that BRICS countries are considered to be high and middle-income countries, the out-of-pocket share of health spending is an important part of healthcare expenditure. Nevertheless, Out-of-Pocket healthcare spending can harm the house’s budget [39 - 42].

Using data from 25 OECD countries, Gerdtham et al. found the correlation between health expenditure and GDP [43]. Researching OECD countries by Solow growth model, Hashmati found a positive connection between HCE and economic growth. A study conducted by Elmi and Sadeghi also found a positive connection between HCE and economic growth. Cetin et al. found a negative correlation between HCE and economic growth [44-45]. In the research conducted by Ollivaud et al., 19 OECD countries experienced a banking crisis from 2007 to 2011 with big losses in output. Bad resource allocation is identified as the main reason [46]. Lago-Peñas’s results based on data from 31 OECD countries showed that HCE is more sensitive to per capita income than to trend movements [47].

In a study of 17 emerging markets and 11 developed countries over a period of 31 years, Kouki et al. found that financial crises have negative and significant effects on economic growth and that developed financial system can reduce crisis [48]. Research of Ksantini et al. on a panel of 25 countries over the 12 years showed that the duration of the crisis depends on the state of development of countries and type of crisis. The financial crisis in the US in 2007 caused an economic slowdown in all regions of the world with the biggest effects on emerging and developing countries [49].

Zaman et al. analyzed the data from Bangladesh, where income had a direct influence on health spending at the individual level. They found a direct relationship between GDP and total HCE [50]. In some studies concerning healthcare expenditure in Turkey, the correlation between economic growth and health expenditure was positive and in some was negative [51].

Results from Piabuo showed that health expenditure has a positive and significant effect on economic growth in both CEMAC countries and five African countries [52]. A lot of studies from Asia and Latin America confirmed that the economic and financial crises resulted in cuts in expenditures on health, lower utilization of health services and health outcome. Monitoring financial situation in Africa is necessary for its health sector protection [53]. The total GDP in the African Region shrunk by 8.6% between 2008 and 2009. The decrease in GDP per capita was the biggest among oil-producing countries.

Ali et al. analyzed four developing countries of Southeast Asia - Pakistan, India, China, and Bangladesh. They got to the conclusion that these countries were struggling in maintaining the quality of health services. GDP of Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh had increased, but of China decreased. China and India are considered to be adequately managing health expenditure. On the other hand, available data indicate Pakistan and Bangladesh need to pay a lot of attention to the development of their health sector. In Southeast Asia, the effect of health expenditure on GDP was insignificant [54]. Abdullah et al. investigated the relation between healthcare expenditure and income in Asian countries for a period of almost twenty years. They concluded that relationship exists and healthcare may be defined as necessary [55].

Since the global economic downturn in 2008, high-income countries cut public health care spending. In high-income countries, private health insurance models implementation will ensure larger health care insurance coverage. On the other hand, in low and middle-income countries there is a doubt that private or public-financing models, or a mix of those, are the best option for reaching for universal health coverage [56].

CIVET’s countries are among the biggest and fastest-growing emerging markets - accounting for more than 50 percent of the world's population, 40 percent of its total geographic area, and 50 percent of global GDP. In research by Yin et al., CIVETS have a lot of commonalities: increasing young population (average age 28), significant economic growth (average annual GDP growth of 4.5% until 2030), and suitability for foreign investment [57]. They are facing high unemployment, corruption, and inequality which are significant barriers for development. CIVETS are experiencing similar levels of economic growth as the BRIC nations in the past ten years. In the research of Akdere, it was found that all CIVETS countries had a big increase in annual GDP during the period of 2000-2012, especially India and Vietnam in 2012 [58]. Global Competitiveness Index ranked Indonesia on the highest place from other CIVETS countries [59, 60].

Ammar Sghari et al. analyzed the relationship between the HCE and real per capita GDP in developing countries (Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of China, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and United States) from 1975 to 2011, highlighting dependence per capita GDP and per capita HCA from one another [61].

Bedir investigated the relationship between economic growth and HCE over the emerging markets in Europe, Middle East Africa, and Asia. He found bilateral causality for the Czech Republic and the Russian Federation. The evidence from Egypt, Hungary, Korean Republic, South Africa, and the Philippines supports the health view over the income view. The evidence from Greece, Poland, United Arab Emirates, China, Indonesia, and the Korean Republic supports the income view over the health view [62]. The general conclusion was that income is an important factor in explaining the variations in healthcare expenditures among countries [63]. GDP level defines the elasticity of income for health spending. The elderly population has effects on healthcare expenditure in African countries and healthcare is necessary good [64].

A portion of GDP used for health expenditure in developed countries is usually bigger than in the developing countries. When the level of development increases, health expenditures increase too. Mehrara et al. found that the share of GDP on expenditures decreases with GDP decrease which indicates that health care is not a luxury in MENA countries [65].

Health care system in Iran comprises from three sectors – a public one which is directed on the primary health care, not-for-profit one for chronic and severe patients, and private sector directed to secondary and tertiary health care. A study by Costa-Font et al. indicated that healthcare budget depends on private and public expenditures and type of healthcare financing [66]. In Iran, the share of HCE as a percent of GDP increased as well as the general GDP invested in healthcare from 2000 [67]. Rezaei et al. indicated three things that lead to a big increase in HCE - GDP per capita, urbanization, and literacy rate. Increase in the number of patients aged 65 and physicians decreases health care expenditures [68]. Other studies also suggest that GDP per capita and urbanization have a positive effect on HCE in Iran [69, 70].

National health care expenditure in Serbia followed the trends from the surrounding countries [71]. GDP increased from lower to the upper middle income in 2012 [72]. Jakovljevic et al. showed that a lot of the countries in Central and Eastern Europe had strong growth in national health expenditure. EU 2004, CIS, and SEE regions experienced differences in their healthcare reform with the strongest expenditure growth among EU 2004, SEE, and the CIS [73 - 76].

HCE expenditures in Korea are related to factors often investigated in the world - GDP, population size, elder population, and the number of physicians and medical institutions [77 - 79]. GDP per capita and population over the 65 years had the strongest effects on HCE [80]. This was also shown in the study of Han et al. where health spending was associated with the proportion of the elderly population (22.4%) and GDP per capita (4.5%) and with Medicare Economic Index in inverse association (-12%) [81].

In the systematic review of Dincer H, Yüksel S. that covered articles on the subject of HCE in E7 countries, it was clear that economic growth has a big impact on expenditure (total, public, and private). Increase in health expenditure positively affects economic growth but also the private health expenditures affect economic growth negatively. In emerging countries, governmental health expenditure is very big, much bigger than private. Recommendations are aiming at the improvement of the private sector role [82].

Noncommittal diseases are one of the reasons why health expenditures are increasing in all countries. In a macroeconomic level, the countries have costs from screening tests, diagnostic tests, medications, hospital, and others [83, 84]. Health spending can be very dramatic across countries with an income reduction, unemployment, and epidemics of chronic illness. Fanourgiakis et al. remind the fact that cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death and in 2009, the EU estimated the costs of cardiovascular disease to be nearly 196 billion per year, which implies the necessity of financial measures to be taken by governments [85]. Cyprus is a unique case in the EU since it is the only country without a universal National Health System. Their current healthcare sector is divided into public and private. Due to poor cooperation between those two sectors, there had been an increase in costs. Petrou’s study indicates the necessity of reforms in health sectors such as a reduction in the number of emergency room visits and unnecessary laboratory tests as well as economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals [86, 87]. Governmental pharmaceutical expenditure is controlled by policymakers, but private pharmaceutical expenditures are in growth. That leads to total pharmaceutical expenditure growth. Clemente et al. showed non-pharmaceutical expenditure to be a significant reason for total HCE reduction [88, 89].

The entry of every country to BRICS is an effort to acquire benefits from the other members. Every country wants investments from others and the ability to utilize resources is something the BRICS nations have displayed more than other emerging markets. BRICS are moving in the right direction while implementing the best HRD practices. The developing nations that are still unable to compete are less willing to adopt HRD techniques. Reaching universal health coverage is an agenda of primary importance in each and every country worldwide. Investigations on this subject and comparison of the results and facts will lead to the huge importance in the way of readjusting of the health system and prioritization of the right problem. So far, the BRICS countries showed the hugest progress in these areas with space for more adjustments and the next eleven countries and OECD are not far behind.

CONCLUSION

After the huge historical recessions, most countries worldwide experienced contractions in their disposable GDP. Through years, some of them successfully solved the problem, faster or slower. The latest 21st-century global recession was not discriminating. It hit every country in the world. Some of them are still recovering. There had always been differences between low and high-income countries in the speed of recovery. Some of the major problems were: the type of country’s health system establishments, health care financing and provision, and the percent of GDP invested in the health. Non communicable diseases are rising in prevalence. Population aging is accelerating as well as the unemployment rates that differ in the countries in the world. There is no universal solution for the problem of economic output decrease. Individual strategic approaches are the best way. Trends in economics must be tracked constantly so the problems can be seen in time and through budgetary cuts and savings may be prevented to some extent. The scale of total investment in healthcare should be as large as the countries can afford because of the population aging and non-communicable diseases increase alongside treatment innovations in medicine and pharmaceutical development. The cost-effectiveness estimates and HTA analyses are among some plausible solutions for making informed resource allocation decisions. The good work in those areas should make the health sector financing more sustainable and the significant system losses should shrink in the economic area.

Limitations of this review are the lack of numerical values expressed in the economic indicators (PPP, USD $, OOP) which could be compared with the results of the economic investigation from studies that dealt with subjects of healthcare expenditure and percentage of GDP investments. As this study is imagined as the descriptive study of current articles, the aim was to display all factors that directly and/or indirectly affected the global increase of healthcare expenditure. Summation of the factors that affect the healthcare expenditure could be useful for readers in designing a similar investigation in their countries considering all mentioned elements and maybe expanding investigation with quantitative economic indicators. The similarity of the results from articles considered in this review could be seen in Table 1 that implies the relationship between GDP and healthcare expenditure with each other and with different contributing factors.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

GDP = Global Domestic Products
HCE = Healthcare Expenditures
UHC = Universal Health Coverage
OECD = Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (36 member countries)
BRICS = Association of five major emerging national economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
CEMAC = Economic Community of Central African States
CIVETS = Six emerging markets countries – Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey, and South Africa
MENA = Middle East and North Africa region
EM7 = Seven countries that represent the largest Emerging Market countries – China, India, Brazil, Russia, Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkey
CIS = Commonwealth of Independent States of 10 post-Soviet republics
SEE = Southeast European Cooperative Initiative
AMA = American Medical Association
ACA = American Counseling Association
OOP = Out of Pocket

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

FUNDING

Grant funded by Swedish FORTE number 2017-02235 and Grant OI 175014 funded by the Serbian Ministry of Education Science and Technological Development have jointly co-financed the underlying efforts behind this contribution.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Professor Mihajlo (Michael) Jakovljevic, Department of Global Health, Economics and Policy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac and Professor Ulf Gerdtham, Division of Health Economics, Lund University, Sweden have contributed to this article in an advisory capacity, while not fully fulfilling the ICMJE criteria for full authorship.

REFERENCES

[1] Céspedes LF, Chang R, Velasco A. Balance sheets and exchange rate policy. Am Econ Rev 2004; 94(4): 1183-93.
[2] Chaney T. Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. Am Econ Rev 2008; 98(4): 1707-21.
[3] Eichengreen B. The political economy of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff 1986.
[4] Nordhaus WD. Geography and macroeconomics: New data and new findings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103(10): 3510-7.
[5] Baier SL, Bergstrand J. The growth of world trade: Tariffs, transport costs and income similarity. J Int Econ 2001; 53(1): 1-27.
[6] Bernanke BS. Nonmonetary effects of the financial crisis in propagation of the great depression. Am Econ Rev 1983; 73(3): 257-76.
[7] Friedman M, Schwartz AJ. Monetary trends in the United States and the United Kingdom: Their relation to income, prices, and interest rates, 1867-1975 1982.
[8] Eichengreen B, Sachs J. Exchange rates and economic recovery in the 1930s. 1984.
[9] Cecchetti S. Prices during the great depression: Was the deflation of 1930-32 really unanticipated? Am Econ Rev 1989; 82(1): 141-56.
[10] Green G, Chandler LV. America’s greatest depression, 1929-1941. J Finance 1971; 26(1): 197.
[11] Jakovljevic MM, Ogura S. Health economics at the crossroads of centuries – from the past to the future. Front Public Health 2016; 4: 115.
[12] Anderson JE, van Wincoop E. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 2003; 93(1): 170-92.
[13] Estevadeordal A, Frantz B, Taylor AMT. The rise and fall of world trade, 1870-1939. Q J Econ 2003; 118(2): 359-407.
[14] Eichengreen B. Viewpoint: Understanding the great depression. Can J Econ 2004; 37(1): 1-27.
[15] Jeanne O, Sachs J. Exchange rates and economic recovery in the 1930s. J Econ Hist 1985; 45(4): 925-46.
[16] Yi KM. Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade? J Polit Econ 2003; 111(1): 52-102.
[17] Chor D, Manova K. Off the cliff and back? Credit conditions and international trade during the global financial crisis 2010.
[18] Perri F, Quadrini V. The great depression in Italy: Trade restrictions and real wage rigidities, review of economic dynamics 2002; 5(1): 128-51.
[19] Ben-David D, Lumsdaine RL, Papell DH. Unit roots, postwar slowdowns and long-run growth: Evidence from two structural breaks. Empir Econ 2003; 28(2): 303-19.
[20] Hall R. The long slump. Am Econ Rev 2011; 431-69.
[21] Zarnovitz V, Moore GH. The recession and recovery of 1973-1976. Explorations in Economic Research 1977; 4: 1-87.
[22] Urquhart M, Hewson Ma. Unemployment continued to rise in 1982 as recession deepened. Mon Labor Rev 1983; 106(2): 3-12.
[23] Bildirici M. AykacxAlp E, Bakirtas T. The great recession and the effects of oil price shocks and the U.S. recession: A Markov-Switching and TAR-VEC analysis. J Energy Finance Dev 2011; 35: 215-77.
[24] Murray C, Charles N. The great depression and output persistence: A reply to papell and prodan. J Money Credit Bank 2004; 429-32.
[25] Mazurek J, Mielcová E. The evaluation of economic recession magnitude: Introduction and application. Prague Econ Pap 2013; 182-205.
[26] Rogoff K, Reinhart C. Growth in a time of debt. Am Econ Rev 2010; 100(2): 573-8.
[27] Coe PJ. Financial crisis and the great depression: A regime switching approach. J Money Credit Bank 2002; 34: 76-93.
[28] Glassman J. Economic crisis in Asia: The case of Thailand*. Econ Geogr 2009; 77(2): 122-47.
[29] Rodrik D. Unconditional convergence in manufacturing. Q J Econ 2013; 1: 40.
[30] Grossman RS, Meissner CM. International aspects of the Great Depression and the crisis of 2007: Similarities, differences, and lessons. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 2010; 26(3): 318-38.
[31] Alessandria G, Kaboski J, Midrigan V. The great trade collapse of 2008-09: An inventory adjustment?. 2010.
[32] Elmi ZM, Sadeghi S. Health care expenditures and economic growth in developing countries: Panel co-integration and causality. Middle East J Sci Res 2012; 12(1): 88-91.
[33] Wang KM. Health care expenditure and economic growth: Quantile panel-type analysis. Econ Model 2011; 28: 1536-49.
[34] Jakovljevic M, Camilleri C, Rancic N, et al. Cold war legacy in public and private health spending in Europe. Front Public Health 2018; 6: 215.
[35] Sisko AM, Keehan SP, Cuckler GA, et al. National health expenditure projections, 2013-23: Faster growth expected with expanded coverage and improving economy. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014; 33(10): 1841-50.
[36] King K. The geopolitics and meanings of India’s massive skills development ambitions. Int J Education Develop 2012; 32(5): 665-73.
[37] Jakovljevic M. Commentary: Patient cost sharing and medical expenditures for the Elderly. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7: 73.
[38] Jakovljevic M, Getzen TE. Growth of global health spending share in low and middle income countries. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7: 21.
[39] Rao KD, Petrosyan V, Araujo EC, McIntyre D. Progress towards universal health coverage in BRICS: Translating economic growth into better health. Bull World Health Organ 2014; 92(6): 429-35.
[40] Hashmati A. On the causality between GDP and health care expenditure in augmented solow growth modelStockholm: Department of Economic Statistics Stockholm school of Economics; 2001.
[41] Jakovljevic M, Potapchik E, Popovich L, Barik D, Getzen TE. Evolving health expenditure landscape of the BRICS nations and projections to 2025. Health Econ 2017; 26(7): 844-52.
[42] Jakovljevic MB. BRIC’s growing share of global health spending and their diverging pathways. Front. Public Health. 2015.
[43] Gerdtham UG, Lothgren M. New panel results on cointegration of international health expenditure and gdp. Appl Econ 2002; 13: 1679-86.
[44] Lago-Peñas SC-P-F. On the relationship between GDP and health care expenditure: A new look. Econ Model 2013; 32: 124-9.
[45] Elmi ZM, Sadeghi S. Health care expenditures and economic growth in developing countries: Panel co-integration and causality. Middle East J Sci Res 2012; 12(1): 88-91.
[46] Cetin M, Ecevit E. Sağlıkhar camalarınıne konomik büyümeüzerinde kietkisi: OECD ülkeleriüzerinebir panel regresyonanalizi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 2017; 11(2): 166-82.
[47] Ollivaud P, Turner D. The effect of the global financial crisis on OECD potential output.OECD. J Econ Stud Vol 2014© OECD 2015.
[48] Kouki M, Belhadj R, Chikhaoui M. Impact of financial crisis on GDP growth: The case of developed and emerging countries. IntJ Econ Financial Iss 2017; 7(6): 212-21.
[49] Ksantinia M, Boujelbèneb Y. Impact of financial crises on growth and investment: An analysis of panel data. J Int Global Econ Stud 2014; 7(1): 32-57.
[50] Zaman SB, Hossain N, Mehta V, Sharmin S, Mahmood SAI. An association of total health expenditure with GDP and life expectancy. J Medi Res Innovation 2017; 1(2): AU7-AU12.
[51] Eryiğit SB, Eryiğit KY, Selen U. The long-run linkages between education, health and defence expenditures and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. Defence Peace Econ 2012; 23(6): 559-74.
[52] Piabuo SM, Tieguhong JC. Health expenditure and economic growth - a review of the literature and an analysis between the economic community for central African states (CEMAC) and selected African countries. Health Econ Rev 2017; 7(1): 23.
[53] Mehrara M, Musai M. Granger causality between economic growth in oil exporting countries. Interdiscip J Res Bus 2011; 1(8): 103-8.
[54] Ali MA, Ullah MI, Asghar MA. Effect of health expenditure on GDP, a panel study based on Pakistan, China, India and Bangladesh. Int J Health Econ Policy 2017; 2(2): 57-62.
[55] Abdullah SM, Siddiqua S, Huque R. Is health care a necessary or luxury product for Asian countries? An answer using panel approach. Health Econ Rev 2017; 7(1): 4.
[56] Wouters OJ, McKee M. Private financing of health care in times of economic crisis: Areview of the evidence. Glob Policy 2016; 8: 23-9.
[57] Yi Y, Qi W, Wu D. Are CIVETS the next BRICs? A comparative analysis fromscientometrics perspective. Scientometrics 2013; 94(4): 615-28.
[58] Akdere M. Human resource development in the civets countries: Implications for leadership and innovation in emerging markets. Journal of Global Strategic Management 2016; 10(2): 45-63.
[59] Le NTB, Venkatesh S, Nguyen TV. Getting bank financing: A study of Vietnamese private firms. Asia Pac J Manage 2006; 23(2): 209-27.
[60] Tomé E, Goyal A. Human capital, HRD and VET: The case of India. Europ J Training Develop 2015; 39(7): 586-609.
[61] Sghari MBA, Hammami S. Relationship between health expenditure and GDP in developed countries. IOSR J Pharm 2013; 3(4): 41-5.
[62] Bedir S. Healthcare expenditure and economic growth in developing countries. Adv Econ Bus 2016; 4(2): 76-86.
[63] Collier P, Goderis B. Commodity prices, growth, and the natural resource curse: Reconciling a conundrum 2007.
[64] Lv Z, Zhu H. Health care expenditure and GDP in African countries: evidence from semiparametric estimation with panel data. ScientificWorldJournal 2014; 2014905747
[65] Mohsen Mehrara. The relationship between health expenditures and economic growth in Middle East & North Africa (MENA) countries. Int J Bus Manag Econ Res 2012; 3(1): 425-8.
[66] Costa-Font J, Pons-Novell J. Public health expenditure and spatial interactions in a decentralized national health system. Health Econ 2007; 16(3): 291-306.
[67] Mehrdad R. Health system in Iran. Japan Med Assoc J 2009; 52(1): 69-73.
[68] Rezaei S, Fallah R, Kazemi Karyani A, Daroudi R, Zandiyan H, Hajizadeh M. Determinants of healthcare expenditures in Iran: evidence from a time series analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2016; 30: 313.
[69] Magazzino C, Mele M. The determinants of health expenditure in Italian regions. Int J Finance Econ 2012; 4(3): 61-72.
[70] Bilgel F, Tran KC. The determinants of Canadian provincial health expenditures: Evidence from dynamic panel. Appl Econ 2013; 45(2): 201-12.
[71] Jakovljević M. Health expenditure dynamics in Serbia 1995-2012. Hospital Pharmacology 2014; 1(3): 180-3.
[72] Jakovljevic M. The key role of leading emerging BRIC markets for the future of global health care. SJECR In press
[73] Jakovljevic M, Jovanovic M, Lazic Z, et al. Current efforts and proposals to reduce healthcare costs in Serbia. Serb J Exp Clin Res 2011; 12: 161-3.
[74] Jakovljevic MB. Resource allocation strategies in Southeastern European health policy. Eur J Health Econ 2013; 14(2): 153-9.
[75] Jakovljevic MB, Vukovic M, Fontanesi J. Life expectancy and health expenditure evolution in Eastern Europe-DiD and DEA analysis. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 16(4): 537-46.
[76] Jakovljevic MM, Netz Y, Buttigieg SC, Adany R, Laaser U, Varjacic M. Population aging and migration - history and UN forecasts in the EU-28 and its east and south near neighborhood - one century perspective 1950-2050. Global Health 2018; 14(1): 30.
[77] Kim HJ, Chun KH. An analysis of determinants of medical cost inflation using both deterministic and stochastic models. Korean J Prev Med 1989; 22(4): 542-54.
[78] Lee KJ, Jung YH. The determinants of national health expenditure: A decision tree analysis. Korean J Health Policy Adm 2002; 12(3): 99-111.
[79] Tchoe B, Nam S, Shin Y. Determinants of the national health expenditures: panel study. Korean J Health Policy Adm 2004; 14(2): 99-116.
[80] Squires DA. Explaining high health care spending in the United States: An international comparison of supply, utilization, prices, and quality. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2012; 10: 1-14.
[81] Han K, Cho M, Chun K. Determinants of health care expenditures and the contribution of associated factors: 16 cities and provinces in Korea, 2003-2010. J Prev Med Public Health 2013; 46(6): 300-8.
[82] Dincer H, Yüksel S. Identifying the causality relationship between health expenditure and economic growth: An application on E7 countries. 2018; 1: 10-38.
[83] Leal J, Luengo-Fernández R, Gray A, Petersen S, Rayner M. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European Union. Eur Heart J 2006; 27(13): 1610-9.
[84] Jakovljevic M, Jakab M, Gerdtham U, et al. Comparative financing analysis and political economy of noncommunicable diseases. J Med Econ 2019; 22(8): 722-7.
[85] Fanourgiakis J, Kanoupakis E. Catastrophic healthcare expenditure during economic recession in the field of cardiovascular disease. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 14(1): 5-8.
[86] Petrou P. Crisis as a serendipity for change in Cyprus’ healthcare services. J Med Econ 2015; 18(10): 805-7.
[87] Petrou P. Pharmacoeconomics in the years of crisis: A solution or just a resolution? A Cyprus perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 14(5): 627-36.
[88] Clemente J, Marcuello C, Montañés A. Pharmaceutical expenditure, total health care expenditure and GDP. Health Econ 2008; 17(10): 1187-206.
[89] Jakovljevic M, Lazarevic M, Milovanovic O, Kanjevac T. The new and old Europe: Eastwest split in pharmaceutical spending. Front. Pharmacol. 2016.